who had seven husbands, the same matter may belong in succession to many bodies, for ?they all had it?? (Smyth). The cannibal and his victim cannot both possess the same body at the resurrection. The Providence Journal had an article entitled: ?Who ate Roger Williams?? When his remains were exhumed, it was found that one large root of an apple tree followed the spine, divided at the thighs, and turned up at the toes of Roger Williams. More than one person had eaten its apples. This root may be seen today in the cabinet of Brown University.
These considerations have led some, like Origen, to call the doctrine of a literal resurrection of the flesh, ?the foolishness of beggarly minds.? To say that resurrection may be only ?the gathering round the spirit of new materials and the vitalizing them into a new body by the spirit?s God- given power.? See Newman Smyth, Old Faiths in a New Light, 349-391; Porter, Human Intellect, 39. But this view seems as great no extreme as that from which it was a reaction. It gives up all idea of unity between the new and the old. If my body were this instant annihilated, and if then, an hour hence. God should create a second body precisely like the present. I could not call it the same with the present body, even though it were animated by the same informing soul and that soul had maintained an uninterrupted existence between the time of the annihilation of the first body and the creation of the second. So, if the body laid in the tomb were wholly dissipated among the elements and God created at the end of the world a wholly new body, it would be impossible for Paul to say, ?this corruptible must put on incorruption? ( <461553>1 Corinthians 15:53) or, ?it is sown in dishonor; it is raised in glory? (verse 43). In short, there is a physical connection between the old and the new, which is intimated by Scripture, but which this theory denies.
Paul himself gives us an illustration which shows that his view was midway between the two extremes: ?that which thou sowest thou sowest not the body that shall be? ( <461537>1 Corinthians 15:37). On the one hand, the wheat that springs up does not contain the precise particles, perhaps does not contain any particles, that were in the seed. On the other hand, there has been a continuous physical connection between the seed sown and the ripened grain at the harvest. If the seed had been annihilated and then ripe grain created, we could not speak of identity between the one and the other. But, because there has been a constant flux, the old particles pressed out by new and these new in their turn succeeded by others that take their places. We can say: ?the wheat has come up.? We bury grain in order to increase it. The resurrection body will be the same with the body laid away in the earth, in the same sense as the living stalk of grain is identical with the seed from which it germinated. ?This mortal must put
<- Previous Table of Contents Next ->
Was this article helpful?
Remember to prepare for everyone in the home. When you are putting together a plan to prepare in the case of an emergency, it is very important to remember to plan for not only yourself and your children, but also for your family pets and any guests who could potentially be with you at the time of the emergency.