and the light of flame cannot severally contemplate and be in love with one another.? See Bushnell?s doctrine reviewed by Hodge, Essays and Reviews, 433-473. On the whole subject, see Dorner, Hist. Doct. Person of Christ, 2:152-169; Shedd, Hist. Doctrine, 1:259; Baur, Lehre von der Dreieinigkeit, 1:256-305; Thomasius, Christi Person und Werk 1:83.

Arius (of Alexandria; condemned by Council of Nice, 325) held that the Father is the only divine being absolutely without beginning; the Son and the Holy Spirit, through whom God creates and recreates, having been themselves created out of nothing before the world was; and Christ being called God, because he is next in rank to God, and is endowed by God with divine power to create.

The followers of Arius have differed as to the precise rank and claims of Christ. While Socinus held with Arius that worship of Christ was obligatory, the later Unitarians have perceived the impropriety of worshiping even the highest of created beings, and have constantly tended to a view of the Redeemer which regards him as a mere man, standing in a peculiarly intimate relation to God.

For statement of the Arian doctrine, see J. Freeman Clarke, Orthodoxy, Its Truths and Errors. Per contra, see Schaffer, in Bibliotheca Sacra, 21:1, article on Athanasius and the Arian controversy. The so-called Athanasian Creed, which Athanasius never wrote, is more properly designated as the Symbolum Quicumque is . It has also been called though facetiously, ?the Anathemasian Creed.? Yet no error in doctrine can be more perilous or worthy of condemnation than the error of Arius ( <461622>1 Corinthians 16:22 ? ?If any man loveth not the Lord, let him be anathema?; <620223>1 John 2:23 ?Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father?; 4:3 ? ?every spirit that confesseth not Jesus is not of God: and this is the spirit of the antichrist?). It regards Christ as called God only by courtesy, much as we give to a Lieutenant Governor the title of Governor. Before the creation of the Son, the love of God, if there could be love, was expended on himself. Gwatkin, Studies of Arianism: ?The Arian Christ is nothing but a heathen idol, invented to maintain a heathenish Supreme in heathen isolation from the world. The nearer the Son is pulled down towards man by the attenuation of his Godhead, the more remote from man becomes the unshared Godhead of the Father. You have an ?tre supr?me who is practically unapproachable, a mere One- and-all, destitute of personality.?

<- Previous Table of Contents Next ->

Was this article helpful?

0 0

Post a comment