Conclusion

The concept of culture, as the recent theoretical attention to it demonstrates, provides an ambiguously useful tool for understanding human existence. While the concept can illuminate and critique theological practices and their social settings, it can equally vex theology's insistence on the openness of human experience to "the other" and "the new". What the most promising recent proposals offer us, however, is a way of seeing in culture itself - in its manifestations and its dynamics - that very otherness and newness that we thought we had to seek somewhere "outside" it.

A number of interesting and important questions (for example, about consumerism, "mass," "pop," and "popular" culture) have been ignored here, only for reasons of space. Nonetheless, we can say that theology's engagement with culture - with both

62 charles t. mathewes

"theology" and "culture" understood in their "catholic" universally inclusive sense - is not a superadditum to some core theological project. As theology is most fundamentally about mediating otherness, some form of theological engagement with culture is already internal to theology. Theology begins from the realization that otherness - and particularly the otherness of God - is at the heart of human selfhood. Anxieties about the mutual contamination of culture and theology reveal here nothing less than our sinfulness, our lack of being the fully worldly beings we are supposed to be. Hence, alongside Milbank's Christological theology of culture and Tanner's Pneumatological one, one might construct a Patrological theology of culture: If God the Father is the Creator and Sustainer of the universe, we must insist that theological discourse -discourse about God - is the most profoundly cultural discourse one can find. In the end, the worry will have never been that theology could be "too cultural," but that it might be, because of wholly human failings, not cultural enough.

Notes

1 As the footnotes only partially show, much of this narrative is drawn from Williams (1983) and Tanner (199 7). I want to finesse the question of agency in this historical sketch. The development of the concept of culture was due to individual human agents; but much of that development was accidental and can only be identified in retrospect. This raises broader questions about the nature of historiography that I will not address here. See Bernstein (1994).

2 See Sperber (1985), esp. Essay 1, "Interpretive Ethnography and Theoretical Anthropology".

3 The best recent work on this is Moody-Adams (1997).

4 Though the Frankfurt School of social thought foreshadows cultural theory.

5 And as with these debates, much of the most creative cultural work occurs where the debates are liveliest, on the margins and in the liminal spaces. See Homi Bhabha (1994).

6 On the curiously underdeveloped concept of "power" typically employed here, see Hjort (1993).

7 Cf. Schleiermacher (1928), Propositions 15-19.

8 This is connected to Schleiermacher's distinction between religion and ethics, and his refusal of what we would call a Christian social ethic.

9 Recently, however, they have arisen again in an interestingly different context, through concerns about what is often called "civil religion," particularly in the United States. See Bellah et al. (1985); for a recent non-American discussion, see Shanks (1995).

10 Barth himself realized this, and in later work suggested that God's alienness to culture is an alienness identical to our own alienness to ourselves, a view he pursued most courageously in his famous late essay "The Humanity of God." See his The Humanity of God (19 78). McCormack (1995) tries to acquit the early Barth but in fact rather ends up indicting his later work as well. Recent deconstructionist thought can be seen as following the early Barth; see Webb (1993).

11 For Protestant thought, see Scharlemann (1990). For Catholic thought, see Tracy (1981). One can locate some of the more theological work of George Steiner in this tradition as well; cf. his Real Presences (1989).

12 Stanley Hauerwas is another important thinker here; but Yoder best exemplifies this view.

13 Today, this sort of ethnically-cleansed "identity politics" is just another style of cultural engagement; perhaps, indeed, the most common style. See Hughes (1993).

14 From "Experience," in Selections from Ralph Waldo Emerson (1957), p. 271.

15 One wonders, however, whether Tanner's work underspecifies the concept of "conflict"; is conflict empty, about nothing but itself, or is it about the overflowingness of God? Tanner's work might be usefully augmented by some of what Milbank has said regarding the differing Kantian and Thomistic views of the relation between human experience and what lies "beyond" it; indeed, a critique of the cultural theorists' overtly Nietzschean view of conflict might help here.

References

Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Barth, K. 19 78. The Humanity of God, trans. T. Weiser. Atlanta, GA: John Knox.

Bellah, R. N. et al. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bernstein, M. A., 1994. Foregone Conclusions: Against Apocalyptic History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bhabha, H. 1994. The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.

Cavell, S. 1969. "The Availability of Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy," in Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44-72.

Cobb, K. 1995. "Reconsidering the Status of Popular Culture in Tillich's Theology of Culture," Journal of the American Academy of Religion Lxm (1) (Spring): 53-84.

Edmundson, M. 199 7. Nightmare on Main Street. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Emerson, R. W. 1957. "Experience," in Selections from Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. S. E. Whicher. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Fabian, J. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.

Geertz, C. 19 73. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

Greenwalt, S. 1990. "Culture," in Critical Terms for Literary Study, eds. F. Lentricchia and T. McLaughlin. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 229-30.

Hjort, M. 1993. The Strategy of Letters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hughes, R. 1993. Culture of Complaint: The Fraying of America. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lindbeck, G. 1984. The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press.

McCormack, B. L. 1995. Karl Barth's Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology: Its Genesis and Development, 1909-1936. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

McDannell, C. 1995. Material Christianity: Religion and Popular Culture in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Masuzawa, T. 1998. "Culture," in Critical Terms for Religious Studies, ed. M. C. Taylor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 70-93.

Milbank, J. 1990. Theology and Social Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Milbank, J. 1997. The Word Made Strange: Theology, Language, Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.

Moody-Adams, M. 199 7. Fieldwork in Familiar Places: Morality, Culture, and Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Niebuhr, H. 1951. Christ and Culture. New York: Harper.

64 charles t. mathewes

Proudfoot, W. 1985. Religious Experience. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Sahlins, M. 1993. "Goodbye to Tristes Tropes: Ethnography in the Context of Modern World History," Journal of Modern History 65(1) (March): 1-25.

Scharlemann, R. 1990. "Transcendental and Poietic Imagination in a Theology of Culture," in Morphologies of Faith: Essays in Religion and Culture in Honor of Nathan A. Scott, Jr., eds. M. Gerhart and A. C. Yu. Atlanta, GA: Scholars' Press, pp. 109-22.

Schleiermacher, F. 1928. The Christian Faith, eds. H. R. MacKintosh and J. S. Stewart. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.

Schweiker, W. 1990. Mimetic Reflections: A Study in Hermeneutics, Theology, and Ethics. New York: Fordham University Press.

Shanks, A. 1995. Civil Society, Civil Religion. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sperber, D. 1985. On Anthropological Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stassen, G. H., Yeager, D. M., and Yoder, J. H. 1996. Authentic Transformation: A New Vision of Christ and Culture. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.

Steiner, G. 1989. Real Presences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Tanner, K. 1997. Theories of Culture: A New Agenda for Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Taylor, M. C. ed. 1998. Critical Terms for Religious Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Tracy, D. 1981. The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism. New York: Crossroad.

Troeltsch, E. 19 79. Christian Thought: Its History and Application, ed. Baron F. von Hügel. London: University of London Press [1923]; reprinted Westport, CT: Hyperion Press.

Webb, S. 1993. Blessed Excess: Religion and the Hyperbolic Imagination. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Williams, R. 19 77. Marxism and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press.

Williams, R. 1983. Culture and Society, 1750-1950. New York: Columbia University Press.

Yack, B. 1986. The Longing for Total Revolution: Philosophic Sources of Social Discontent from Rousseau to Marx and Nietzsche. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Yack, B. 1997. The Fetishism of Modernities: Epochal Self-Consciousness in Contemporary Social and Political Thought. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Was this article helpful?

0 0

Post a comment