By the early 1970s, so much scientific data had poured in repudiating the basic aspects of the various cosmologies, that something had to be done. In the past, the elusive hope had always offered itself that, even though all the past theories of matter and stellar origins might be in shambles, there was always the possibility that some brilliant mind might yet come up with a solution.
In April 1972, the top minds in stellar physics, chemistry, and astronomy gathered at the Nice Symposium. A
declaratory statement of purpose included this comment: "The Symposium has also served in delineating the areas of our ignorance, in particular in relation with the hydrodynamics of the nebula [motions of gas clouds], and with the physicochemistry of the 'sticking process' [getting gas together into stars and planets]."—*Sympo-sium Statement, quoted in R.E. Kofahi andK.L. Segraves, The Creation Explanation, p. 141.
Many insurmountable problems were discussed, but it seemed that all the participants could do was list the problems. No one seemed to have any answers. " Yet to be discussed adequately is the detailed fragmentation of the massive cloud in which protostars are born.  Also in question are the hydrodynamics and stability considerations of the protosun nebula.  Most important, there remain to be specified the crucial experimental tests that can distinguish between the available viable theories.  It is particularly disappointing that we have almost no useful information on the specific solid state processes at work in the accretion phase."— *Review of Nice Symposium, quoted in op. cit., p. 143.
Here, in simple language, is a restatement of the above questions, for which scientists have no answers: (1) How did the first cloud break apart and change into stars? (2) How did the gas clouds whirl themselves toward production of stellar objects, in such a way as to solve the angular momentum problem? (3) Boys, we ought to be able to experimentally prove at least one of these theories! (4) How did the gas push itself into solids?
*H. Reeves, the editor of the final Symposium Report, listed seven fundamental problems. The above reviewer quotes them:
"Do the sun and planets originate in the same interstellar cloud? If so, how was the planetary matter separated from the solar gas? How massive was the nebula?
How did the collapsing cloud cross the thermal, magnetic, and angular momentum barriers? What were the physical conditions in the nebula? What was the mechanism of condensation and accretion [of gas into stars, planets, etc.]? How did the planets, with their present properties and solar distances, form?"—*Ibid.
If you open a typical science book on astronomy, you will find theories about the origin of the universe and stars stated with great certainty, and you will be bombarded with paintings of gas clouds and protostars.
If you attend a closed-door conference, such as the Nice Symposium, you will find worried men, desperate theories, scientific facts which condemn those theories, a lack of alternative explanations, an atmosphere of hopeless despair in the face of unproven and unprov-able ideas, and no solutions or scientific experiments able to alleviate the situation.
Was this article helpful?