By pollinating the plant, the moth develops ■foba(yucca seeds) for Its larvae while ensuring that the plant can perpetuate its own kind as well.
But that's not all. The life cycle of the yucca moth is timed so the adult moths emerge in early summer—exactly when the yucca plants are in flower.
How could this remarkable relationship have
Evolution cannot explain remarkable symbiotic relationships between species. Here a whale shark patiently waits while yellow-and-black pilot fish swim in and out of its mouth—cleaning its teeth!
developed by random minor changes In both plant and Insect over eons? It is obvious that It appeared abruptly or It never could have developed at all.
All animal life Is equipped with some sort of survival Instinct. Each knows what kind of food It needs and a means to avoid or defend Itself against any predators. Yet some creatures allow other species they would otherwise eat to carry out cleaning and hygiene tasks without threat or harm. Scientists call this phenomenon "cleaning symbiosis."
It is common for large fish such as sharks, after consuming smaller fish, to have food remains and parasites Imbedded around their teeth. Eventually these particles can produce disease or a dangerous build-up of matter that can hinder eating. But certain types of small fish eklst that function as'biological toothbrushes, safely cleaning the teeth of the larger predators.
The cleaning fish fearlessly swim Inside the open mouth of the larger fish and carefully eat the debris and parasites from the teeth. How can a predator fish restrain his Instincts of getting a free meal by just closing his mouth and chewing, or avoid lashing out because of the Irritating cleaning process? These actions go directly against the self-preservation Instincts of both animals, yet they methodically carry out this sanitizing procedure. Some species even set up the equivalent of cleaning stations, where the larger fish patiently wait for their turn while others ahead of them have their mouths cleaned.
Such cleaning symbiosis Is also found among a species of bird and a reptile. In Egypt the Egyptian plover hops right Into the open mouth of the Nile crocodile to remove parasites. After the job Is done, whether the crocodile is hungry or not the bird always leaves unscathed.
How could such diverse animals, which normally have a predator-victim relationship, become partners In a cleanup operation? If these procedures evolved, as evolutionists contend must have happened, how many birds would have been eaten alive before the crocodile decided It was in his Interest to let one clean Its mouth, then proceed to let It escape? In contrast, how many birds would have continued picking crocodile teeth when they saw some of their feathery cousins eaten alive by crocodiles? They certainly are Instinctively aware that better and safer ways of getting a meal are available to them.
Such sophisticated relationships among diverse creatures show an underlying Intelligent design and forethought at work. Symbiotic relationships are clearly a great challenge to Darwinism, providing solid evidence of a Designer and Creator.
surprising is that they are able to reach their distant destiny even on their first trip—without any experience!
For instance, the white-throated warbler migrates every year from Germany to Africa. Remarkably, when the adult birds migrate, they leave their offspring behind. Several weeks later, when the young birds are strong enough, they instinctively fly across thousands of miles of unknown land and sea to arrive at the same spot where their parents are waiting! How can these inexperienced birds navigate with such accuracy across thousands of miles and arrive safely to be reunited with their parents?
From North America the golden plover circumnavigates around most of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres in its migrations. After nesting in Canada and Alaska, plovers begin their trip from the northeastern tip of Canada and fly across the ocean down to Brazil and Argentina, a trip of more than 2,400 miles. When the season is over they travel back north, taking a different route through South and Central America, then up the Mississippi basin all the way to their nesting grounds. They do this flawlessly year after year.
Dr. Scott Huse comments: "The causes of migrations and the incredible sense of direction shown by these animals presents the evolutionist with one of the most baffling problems of science. Evolutionists are indeed hard-pressed to explain how these remarkable abilities evolved piecemeal through mere chance processes apart from any directing intelligence. The piecemeal development of such an instinct seems highly improbable because migratory instincts are useless unless perfect. Obviously, it is of no benefit to be able to navigate perfectly across only half of an ocean" (The Collapse of Evolution, 1998, p. 34).
The salmon's amazing cycle
Some species of salmon exhibit amazingly complex migrations. Hatching from eggs in streams, they spend the first few years of life in freshwater lakes and rivers. After growing to several inches they swim downstream to the ocean, where they adapt to a completely different chemical environment—saltwater—and spend the next few years.
In the process they often migrate for thousands of miles as they feed and grow. Eventually, toward the end of their lives, they leave the ocean environment and swim upriver and upstream against the current until they reach the very stretch of stream where they were i— ~ ' ' --m -
Oddities in Nature That Defy Evolution hatched years earlier. There they spawn and die, with their decaying bodies providing nutrients for the newly laid eggs. The eggs then hatch to start a new generation, repealing the amazing cycle.
These many adaptations go against the supposed "numerous, successive, slight modifications" of evolutionary theory as well as plain common sense. If species are well adapted to live in freshwater, why undergo the physiological changes necessary to live in saltwater? And why the enormous and exhausting trip back to their original birthplace only to face certain death?
How do these fish, after traveling up to several thousand miles, manage to find the very streams in which they were first spawned several years earlier? No plausible evolutionary explanation has been offered.
In Hawaiian waters swims the astounding decoy fish. When hunting for other fish to eat, it raises its dorsal fin, which appears as a small, helpless fish, complete with an apparent mouth and eye.
It then stays motionless except for the dorsal fin, which it moves from side to side to make the decoy appear to open and close its mouth. The fin itself becomes transparent except for its upper part, which looks like a separate fish. It turns a bright red, enhancing the illusion of a smaller fish. This unassuming creature thereby creates an optical illusion that even a Hollywood special-effects artist would envy. To an incoming fish the decoy looks like an easy meal, and as it moves in for the kill it suddenly finds itself inside the jaws of the decoy fish.
As Dr. Huse points out: "The decoy-fish clearly exhibits great ingenuity, attention to biological details, and a sense of purposeful-ness. No matter how one contorts one's reasoning, one cannot explain such a marvel in terms of the evolutionary theory. Such clear design does not result from mere chance but rather requires careful and deliberate blueprint encoding within the DNA of the decoy-fish by a highly capable molecular programmer" (p. 36).
And there are other fish species that use similar deceptions to snare a meal. "One type of anglerfish has a 'fishing rod' coming out of its back with a luminescent 'bulb' at the end of it. Another, the deep-sea angler, has a 'light bulb' hanging from the roof of its mouth. It just swims around with an open mouth, dangling the lure from side
56 Creation or Evolution: Does It Really Matter What You Believe?
56 Creation or Evolution: Does It Really Matter What You Believe?
Was this article helpful?