Roman Miracle

A pretty maid, a Protestant, was to a Catholic wed; To love all Bible truths and tales, quite early she'd been bred.

It sorely grieved her husband's heart that she would not comply, And join the Mother Church of Rome and heretics deny.

So day by day he flattered her, but still she saw no good Would ever come from bowing down to idols made of wood. The Mass, the host, the miracles, were made but to deceive; And transubstantiation, too, she'd never dare believe.

He went to see his clergyman and told him his sad tale. "My wife is an unbeliever, sir; you can perhaps prevail; For all your Romish miracles my wife has strong aversion, To really work a miracle may lead to her conversion."

The priest went with the gentleman-he thought to gain a prize. He said, "I will convert her, sir, and open both her eyes." So when they came into the house, the husband loudly cried, "The priest has come to dine with us!" "He's welcome," she replied.

And when, at last, the meal was o'er, the priest at once began, To teach his hostess all about the sinful state of man;

The greatness of our Savior's love, which Christians can't deny, To give Himself a sacrifice and for our sins to die.

"I will return tomorrow, lass, prepare some bread and wine; The sacramental miracle will stop you soul's decline."

"I'll bake the bread," the lady said. "You may," he did reply, "And when you've seen this miracle, convinced you'll be, say I."

The priest did come accordingly, the bread and wine did bless. The lady asked, "Sir, is it changed?" The priest answered, "Yes, It's changed from common bread and wine to truly flesh and blood; Begorra, lass, this power of mine has changed it into God!"

So having blessed the bread and wine, to eat they did prepare. The lady said unto the priest, "I warn you to take care,

For half an ounce of arsenic was mixed right in the batter, But since you have its nature changed, it cannot really matter."

The priest was struck real dumb—he looked as pale as death. The bread and wine fell from his hands and he did gasp for breath. "Bring me my horse!" the priest cried, "This is a cursed home!" The lady replied, "Begone; tis you who shares the curse of Rome."

The husband, too, he sat surprised, and not a word did say. At length he spoke, "My dear," said he, "the priest has run away; To gulp such mummery and tripe, I'm not for sure, quite able; I'll go with you and well renounce this Roman Catholic fable."

Author Unknown sacrifice on the Cross should be daily renewed by an unbloody sacrifice of his Body and Blood in the Mass under the simple elements of bread and wine."6 Because the elements are changed into Christ, he "is present in our churches not only in a spiritual manner but really, truly, and substantially as the victim of a sacrifice."1 Though the ritual has been carried out millions of times, attempts are made to explain that it is the same sacrifice as Calvary because the victim in each case is Jesus Christ.8

The very idea of Christ—"flesh and blood, body and soul, Divinity and humanity"—being offered repeatedly as a "renewal" of the sacrifice of the cross, stands in sharp contrast to the words of Jesus on the cross, "It is finished" (John 19:30). The Old Testament sacrifices had to be continually offered because none of them was the perfect sacri-fice.But now "we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ ONCE for all. For every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins: but this man (Christ), after he had offered ONE sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God., .for by ONE offering he perfected for ever them that are sanctified " (Heb. 10:10-14).

Catholic doctrine says the sacrifice of Christ on the cross should "be daily renewed", but the New Testament sets the idea of "daily sacrifices" in contrast to the ONE sacrifice of Christ. He was not to be offered often, for "as it is appointed unto men once to die...so Christ was ONCE offered to bear the sins of many" (Heb. 9:25-28). In view of this, those who believe the sacrifice of the cross should be continually renewed in the Mass, in a sense, "crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame" (Heb. 6:6).

After the bread has been changed into "Christ" by the priest, it is placed on a monstrance in the center of a sunburst design. Before the monstrance Catholics will bow and worship the little wafer as God! This practice, in our opinion, is similar to the practices of heathen tribes which worship fetishes. Is it scriptural? Notice what The Catholic Encyclopedia says: "In the absence of Scriptural proof, the Church finds a warrant for, Monstrance and a propriety in, rendering Divine worship to the Blessed Sacrament in the most ancient and constant tradition..."9 This reasoning brings to mind the words of Jesus, "...making the word of God of none effect through your tradition" (Mark 7:13).

Adopting the idea that the elements of the Lord's Supper become the literal flesh and blood of Christ was not without its problems. Tertullian tells us that priests took great care that no crumb should fall—lest the body of Jesus be hurt! Even a crumb was believed to contain a whole Christ. In the Middle Ages, there were serious discussions as to what should be done if a person were to vomit after receiving communion or a dog or mouse were by chance to eat God's body! At the Council of Constance, it was argued whether a man who spilled some of the blood of Christ on his beard should have his beard burned, or if the beard and the man should be destroyed by burning. It is admitted on all sides that numerous strange doctrines accompanied the idea of transubstan-tiation.

In the New Testament church it is evident that Christians partook of both the bread and the fruit of the vine as emblems of Christ's death (1 Cor. 11:28). This The Catholic Encyclopedia admits. "It may be stated as a general fact, that down to the twelfth century, in the West as well as in the East, public Communion in the churches was ordinarily administered and received under both kinds," a fact "clearly beyond dispute."10 But, after all these centuries, the Roman Catholic Church began to hold back the cup from the people, serving them only the bread. The priest drank the wine. One argument was that someone might spill the blood of Christ. But was it not possible that the early disciples could have spilled the cup? Christ did not withhold it from them on this basis! Serving only half of what Jesus had instituted called for certain "explanations." It was explained that "communion under one kind", as it was called, was just as valid as taking both. The people would not be deprived of any "grace necessary for salvation" and that "Christ is really present and is received whole and entire, body and blood, soul and Divinity, under either species alone...holy mother the Church ...has approved the custom of communicating under one kind...Not only, therefore, is Communion under both kinds not obligatory on the faithful, but the chalice is strictly for bidden by ecclesiastical law to any but the celebrating priest"!11 After many centuries, this law has now been relaxed. Some Catholics are allowed to partake of both bread and cup, but customs vary from place to place.

Did the idea of transubstantiation begin with Christ? The historian Durant tells us that the belief in transubstantiation as practiced in the Roman Catholic Church is "one of the oldest ceremonies of primitive religion."12 In the scholarly work Hasting's Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, many pages are devoted to an article "Eating the god." In these pages, abundant evidence is given of transubstantiation rites among many nations, tribes, and religions. Such rites were known in pagan Rome as evidenced from Cicero's rhetorical question about the corn of Ceres and the wine of Bacchus. In Mithraism, a sacred meal of bread and wine was celebrated. "Mithraism had a Eucharist, but the idea of a sacred banquet is as old as the human race and existed at all ages and amongst all peoples," says The Catholic Encyclopedia.13

In Egypt a cake was consecrated by a priest and was supposed to become the flesh of Osiris. This was then eaten and wine was taken as a part of the rite.14 Even in Mexico and Central America, among those who had never heard of Christ, the belief in eating the flesh of a god was found. When Catholic missionaries first landed there, they were surprised "when they witnessed a religious rite which reminded them of communion...an image made of flour...after consecration by priests, was distributed among the people who ate it... declaring it was the flesh of the deity."15

Hislop suggests that the idea of eating the flesh of a god was of cannibalistic inception. Since heathen priests ate a portion of all sacrifices, in cases of human sacrifice, priests of Baal were required to eat human flesh. Thus "Cahna-Bal", that is, "priest of Baal," has provided the basis for our modern word "cannibal."16

During Mass, members of the Romish church in good standing may come forward and kneel before the priest who places a piece of bread in their mouths which has become a "Christ." This piece of bread is called "host", from a Latin word originally meaning "victim" or "sacrifice."17 The Catholic Encyclopedia says that the host "has been the object of a great many miracles" including the bread being turned to stone and hosts which have bled and continued to bleed.18

Hosts are made in a round shape, this form first being mentioned by St. Epiphanius in the fourth century.19 (TTie illustration shows the way the "host" appears in a Catholic picture dictionary.) But when Jesus instituted the memorial supper, he simply took bread and brake it. Bread does not break into round pieces! Breaking the bread actually represents the body of Jesus which was broken for us by the cruel beatings and stripes. But this symbolism is not carried out by serving a round, disk shaped wafer completely whole.

If the use of a round wafer is without scriptural basis, is it possible that we are faced with another example of pagan influence? Hislop says, "The 'round' wafer, whose 'roundness' is so important an element in the Romish Mystery, is only another symbol of Baal, or the sun"2Q We know that round cakes were used in the ancient mysteries of Egypt. "The thin, round cake occurs on all altars."21 In the mystery religion of Mithraism, the higher initiates of the system received a small round cake or wafer of unleavened bread which symbolized the solar disk,22 as did their round tonsure.

In 1854 an ancient temple was discovered in Egypt with inscriptions that show little round cakes on an altar. Above the altar is a large image of the sun 23 A similar sun-symbol was used above the altar of a temple near the town of Babain, in upper Egypt, where there is a representation of the sun, before which two priests are shown worshipping. (See illustration).

This use of the sun-image above the "altar" was not limited to Egypt. Even in far away Peru, this same image was known and worshipped.24 If there is any doubt that the shape of the host was influenced by sun-worship, one may simply compare the sun-image before which the heathen bowed with

Egyptian sun image.

the monstrance sun-image—in which the host is placed as a "sun" and before which Catholics bow—and a striking similarity will immediately be seen.

Even among the Israelites, when they fell into Baal worship, sun-images were set up above their altars! But during the reign of Josiah, these images were torn down: "And they brake down the altars of Baalim in his presence; and the images (margin, sun-images) that were on high above them" (2 Chron. 34:4). An accompanying old woodcut illustrates some of the strange images that they worshipped, including two sun-images at the top of columns.

The photograph on the next page shows the altar of St. Peter's and huge canopy (the baldachi-num)—ninety-five feet high—which is supported by four columns, twisted and slightly covered by branches. At the top of the columns—"on high above" the most important altar in Catholicism—are sun-images like those that were used in pagan worship. High on

Sun worship in Peru.

Haggadah woodcut (1867) of ancient Jewish Idolatry

Haggadah woodcut (1867) of ancient Jewish Idolatry

Interior of St, Peter's showing sun images.

*lu \i (I e lit* pbotoi,,iaph al<«u stun»«, is .1 hiijic »id elaho 1 m j.olds is -uiihuisi Milage ivIik li, fium tike euttam • <»i (he church, also appears "above" the altar, A large sun-image also appears above the altar of the Churcli of the Gesu, Home, and hundreds of others. (Illustration on page 132). Interestingly enough, the great temple at Babylon also featured a golden sun-image.2,3

Sometimes the circular sun-image is a stained glass window aljtn ihi .dial 01, a- 1- > < > . jbtm 1 lie* miiam »* «#t churches. Some of these central circular windows are beautifully decorated. Some are surrounded with sun rays. In Babylon there were temples with images of the sun-god to fact» the rising sun. placed above the entries.26 An early Babylonian temple built by king Gudea featured such an emblem of the sun-god over the entraii.ee.2 7 It was a custom for

Interior of the Church of the Gesu, Rome.

Egyptian builders to place a solar disk (sometimes with wings or other emblems) over the entrance of their temples— to honor the sun-god and drive away evil spirits. We are not suggesting, of course, that the round designs in use today convey the meanings they once did to those who went to heathen temples. Nevertheless, the similarity seems significant.

The circular window that has been so commonly used above the entrances of churches is sometimes called a "wheel" window. The wheel design, as the wheel of a chariot, was believed by some of the ancients to also be a sun-symbol. They thought of the sun as a great chariot driven by the sun-god who made his trip across the heavens each day and passed through the underworld at night. When the Israelites mixed the religion of Baal into their worship, they had "chariots of the sim"—chariots dedicated to the sun-god (2 Kings 23:4-11). An image in the form of a chariot wheel is placed over the famous statue of Peter in St. Peter's. A tablet now in a British museum shows one of the Babylonian kings restoring a symbol of the sun-god in the temple of Bel. The symbol is an eight pointed cross, like a spoked wheel. A similar design marks the pavement of the circular court before St. Peter's. (See page 43).

Romish pictures of Mary and the saints always feature a

Circular stained glass window.

circular sun-symbol disk around their heads. The Roman tonsure is round. Round images are seen above the altars and entrances. The monstrance in which the round host is placed often features a sun-burst design. All of these uses of sun symbols may seem quite insignificant. But when the over-all picture is seen, each provides a clue to help solve the mystery of Babylon modern.

The round wafers of the Mass are often pictured as circles marked with crosses. We can't help but notice how ©©© similar these are to the round wafers seen in the drawing of an Assyrian monument which we have reproduced below.

Assyrian monument scene

In this scene, one man is bowing before a priest-king and beneath a sun-image. The second man from the right is bringing an offering of round wafers marked with crosses!

When Jesus instituted the memorial supper, it was at night. It was not at breakfast time, or at lunch time. The first Christians partook of the Lord's supper at night, following the example of Christ and the types of the Old Testament. But later the Lord's supper came to be observed at a morning meeting.28 To what extent this may have been influenced by Mithraism, we cannot say. We do know that the Mithraic rites were observed early in the morning, being associated with the sim, with dawn. For whatever reason, it is now a common custom among both Catholic and Protestant churches to take the Lord's "supper" in the morning.

A factor that may have encouraged the early morning Mass within the Catholic church was the idea that a person should be fasting before receiving communion. Obviously early

morning was an easier time to meet this requirement! But to require such fasting cannot be solidly built on scripture, for Jesus had just eaten when he instituted the memorial supper! On the other hand, those who sought initiation in the Eleusi-nian mysteries were first asked: "Are you fasting?" If their answer was negative, initiation was denied.29 Fasting itself is, of course, a Biblical doctrine. But true fasting must come from the heart and not merely because of a man-made rule. Of such, God says, "When they fast, I will not hear their cry" (Jer. 14:12). The Pharisees were strict about fasting on certain days, but neglected the weightier matters of the law (Matt. 6:16). Paul warned about certain commandments to "abstain from meats" as being a mark of apostasy (1 Tim. 4:3).

In commenting on the Mass and its elaborate ritualism, Romanism and the Gospel s^ys: "It is a spectacle of gorgeous magnificence—lights, colors, vestments, music, incense, and what has a strange psychological effect, a number of drilled officiants performing a stately ritual in entire independence of the worshippers. These are indeed spectators, not participants, spectators like those who were present at a performance of the ancient mystery cults."30 A noted work on Catholicism summarizes the mechanical performance made by the priest during Mass: "He makes the sign of the cross sixteen times; turns toward the congregation six times; lifts his eyes to heaven eleven times; kisses the altar eight times; folds his hands four times; strikes his breast ten times; bows his head twenty-one times; genuflects eight times; bows his shoulders seven times; blesses the altar with the sign of the cross thirty times; lays his hands flat on the altar twenty-nine times; prays secretly eleven times; prays aloud thirteen times; takes the bread and wine and turns it into the body and blood of Christ; covers and uncovers the chalice ten times; goes to and fro twenty times."31 Adding to this complicated ritualism is the use of highly colored robes, candles, bells, incense, music, and the showy pageantry for which Romanism is known. What a contrast to the simple memorial supper instituted by Christ!

Enneagram Essentials

Enneagram Essentials

Tap into your inner power today. Discover The Untold Secrets Used By Experts To Tap Into The Power Of Your Inner Personality Help You Unleash Your Full Potential. Finally You Can Fully Equip Yourself With These “Must Have” Personality Finding Tools For Creating Your Ideal Lifestyle.

Get My Free Ebook


Responses

  • ROBERT
    What is the meaning of roman miracle?
    2 years ago

Post a comment